Baudelaire's reading reviewed (1 Viewer)

cirerita

Founding member
Too bad it's incomplete, but there you go...

Hey, I just noticed this Baudelaire's reading is not in the timeline...
 

Attachments

  • Santa Barbara News & Reviews, Oct 24, 1975.pdf
    372.1 KB · Views: 180
Hey, I just noticed this Baudelaire's reading is not in the timeline...
Really? I see it there... ;)

It took three people to write that article? Wow.

I never heard of the LA Star paper. This article claims "Notes of a Dirty Old Man" moved there from Open City...
 
Never trust an article written by 3 people!

By the way, if the quotes from the reading are accurate, it seems to me that this reading is the same one as the 1977 one listed in the timeline. I recall listening to the audio file and someone asking B. about big-nosed women...
 
By the way, if the quotes from the reading are accurate, it seems to me that this reading is the same one as the 1977 one listed in the timeline. I recall listening to the audio file and someone asking B. about big-nosed women...
I was wondering the same thing. But each of the tapes has hand-written dates on them, so it would be a weird mistake. Still, it could be the same reading.


bukcassettetapes.jpg



The review date of October 1975 isn't anywhere near these dates though, so I don't know...maybe that guy just shouted the "big nosed women" question at every Baudelaire's reading. ;) Too bad we don't have the entire review. May be more clues there.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top