Baudelaire's reading reviewed (1 Viewer)

[cirerita]

Too bad it's incomplete, but there you go...

Hey, I just noticed this Baudelaire's reading is not in the timeline...

 

[Father Luke]

Thanks.

 

[mjp]

Hey, I just noticed this Baudelaire's reading is not in the timeline...

Really? I see it there... ;)

It took three people to write that article? Wow.

I never heard of the LA Star paper. This article claims "Notes of a Dirty Old Man" moved there from Open City...

 

[cirerita]

Never trust an article written by 3 people!

By the way, if the quotes from the reading are accurate, it seems to me that this reading is the same one as the 1977 one listed in the timeline. I recall listening to the audio file and someone asking B. about big-nosed women...

 

[mjp]

By the way, if the quotes from the reading are accurate, it seems to me that this reading is the same one as the 1977 one listed in the timeline. I recall listening to the audio file and someone asking B. about big-nosed women...

I was wondering the same thing. But each of the tapes has hand-written dates on them, so it would be a weird mistake. Still, it could be the same reading.

The review date of October 1975 isn't anywhere near these dates though, so I don't know...maybe that guy just shouted the "big nosed women" question at every Baudelaire's reading. ;) Too bad we don't have the entire review. May be more clues there.