mjp
Founding member
That was really something...don't know how I missed it the first time around. Thanks.same era interview with studs terkel (and some great live tunes)
http://www.downhomeradioshow.com/2008/11/studs-terkel-interviews-bob-dylan-1963/
For the first four Dylan albums, mono makes complete sense. There's absolutely no need for stereo. But after that, I prefer the sound of each instrument and mixing them in my head. They may have spent ~300x more time on the mono, but for what? A focused sound for AM radio? These days, mono and stereo are both viable formats, but in a band situation (for Dylan, Bringing it... onwards) there are major differences in many cases. For a band situation, my preference is 99% of the time for stereo. And not so much for the separation, but for the distinction among instruments. I mentioned While My Guitar Gently Weeps a while back (2009 CD reissues). The instruments on the mono version are a mish-mash of incomprehensible warblings from a dumpster on Pluto while the stereo version presents every instrument clearly. It's no contest at all. Stereo>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So my point is, it took a long time to do the mono, and then it was, “Oh, yeah, we gotta do stereo.”