this author gets something wrong. Sure, a special & valuable edition of a Buk-book should have its price (and I dunno what kind of so called "first edition" he was referring to).
But what's wrong with Buk at a big publisher (as long as they don't start to stop some books from availability just bc they don't sell too well)? I don't see anything wrong in it.
I see some collector's concern - but there will always be items and prices for them.
And what I also see is: a STRONG NEED for the 'poor' and for the Kids to be able to discover Buk, which means they DO need to get him on a bargain! (and I say the cheap-selling first ed, this guy was complaining about at the start, was only an excuse to make the WHOLE thing look dirty!)
To prove HC/Ecco suckers he complains about the covers (a topic we had here too) and indeed one can be unhappy with them - but what does this have to do with his complain in the first place? It's another battlefield. He intermixes. (and it seems to me, he only does, to make HC/Ecco look miserable.)
Then he states the 'Newest' of all information: "Charles Bukowski is just another widget in their global operation and it is failing him." - oooh, poor Bukowski! you got into the meatgrinder of bookselling-business, you will Die of it!
This person sounds like some fan of an underground-band, who he was recommending to EVERYONE All the time to Spread their popularity - and right after they MAKE it and sign at a major label, he drops them because they've become "commercial".
crap!
Again: this doesn't mean, I think HC/Ecco does everything the right way. Only his arguments are LESS than weak!
o.k., maybe he was writing his thing when drunk, like I am now, but then I don't see why they paid him. I - at least - don't need to get paid for my 15 minutes of telling what I think.
and thanks for listening.