That sounds like fun, although personally I'd prefer to see it done to a writer that I cannot stand.
YesThe real problem is opinion disguised as "criticism." If the writer of the trite Esquire piece had bothered with actual comparative techniques...if he bothered looking at language, & sentence structure, & tried to unlock a few metaphors instead of his blanket dismissal of Buk's work..maybe I could take what he said more seriously.
And yes.No - the real crime is that guy was paid to write the piece; & that the magazine published the piece; & when we read it it was obvious how hopelessly ill-informed the writer was...& we had no choice but to discount what the writer & the magazine attempts because they are lazy & don't check facts...thereby wasting everyone's time.
yeah, I was thinking along that line. Which would need douch(e) to mean something dirty.[...] other English words that use -bag, there are a lot. Scumbag, shitbag, dirtbag...
sac.What is bag French for?
Strangegirl coming outta her shell!You get drunk, you have sex, with some asshole you met at a bar. You of course were to drunk to stop it, it happens, been there done that....
The next morning you wake up and Think "What the fuck was I thinking having sex with that douchebag"
You immediately go to the bathroom to wash that whole experience out and down the drain.
The douchbag hold the contents of the whole humiliating, stupid, insane, drunken and unmemorable experience.:D
Kubrick's one, of course. He (helped by Ryan O'Neal) succeeded into transfiguring a character that appears as incredibly ridiculous and hateful in Thackeray's picaresque novel.Kubrick's version, or William Makepeace Thackeray's? ;)