Posthumous Books

PhillyDave

“The essential doesn't change.” Beckett
Over 1000 posts
#3
Maybe Betting on the Muse. History has proven that it seems to not be tampered with/edited much at all by Martin. I like it okay. Really, though? None. You guys might wanna read mjp's link on this thread. Very eye opening. https://bukowskiforum.com/threads/t...ost-by-john-martins-black-sparrow-press.7974/. Well, let me clarify. The post-lifetime books edited by Martin are a no no. All three volumes of these are fine. http://www.lulu.com/shop/prague-collective/volume-1/paperback/product-21880388.html
 
Last edited:
#6
Yes.

I compare his posthumous books to a band you really like that puts out a box set filled with a bunch of unreleased tracks. At first. you're all excited because its stuff you haven't heard before. After awhile, you understand why they didn't make the record.

The only after death books I find myself going back to seem to be Muse, What Matters Most and Continual Condition. Just my personal preference. Not saying I'm right or wrong. I was just curious what others thought of the later books.
 

PhillyDave

“The essential doesn't change.” Beckett
Over 1000 posts
#7
I started out, not on purpose, reading the after death stuff when it came out. Once I discovered the difference, the real difference, between the before & after material I had an almost impossible time going back to the after death Martin-ized stuff. Still do.
 

mjp

Keep my good eye on the beat
Moderator
Founding member
Over 5000 posts
#8
There's nothing wrong with the poems in the posthumous books as Bukowski wrote them. When you read the manuscripts for them, they're just as good (or bad) as the poems in any of the collections that were published when Bukowski was alive.

The problem is John Martin's "editing" in the posthumous books. You aren't seeing the poems as they were written, you're seeing watered down, poetry-for-dummies versions of them. But if you didn't know that the poems were altered - as most people don't - no one could blame you for believing that many of them just stink, and maybe they shouldn't have been published.

But again, look at the manuscripts and you'll quickly be disabused of that notion. As the kids say.
 

cirerita

Founding member
Over 1000 posts
#17
I can't speak for Bersarin, but I do think that, overall, the uncollected stuff is usually stronger than most unpublished stuff. For The People Look Like Flowers at Last, Martin culled most poems off early little mags. Posthumous doctoring aside, the poems in The People might be stronger because they were largely uncollected then --rather than unpublished.

When I was putting together Storm, I re-read everything unpublished and uncollected, and I picked some 400 poems that I found strong enough to be published: 300 of them were uncollected, 100 unpublished.
 
Top