reviews at time of publication

#1
I'm really curious what people (mainstream, I guess) thought of CB's work when first published. Does anyone here know of reviews or have personal anecdotes about this?
 

Rekrab

Usually wrong.
Over 1000 posts
#4
From personal experience, mainstream critics and most academics hated Bukowski when he was first widely published, back in the 1960s - 70s. They thought it was bad writing and that he was a drunken slob. The only place he got any respect was in the little magazines and the alternative newspapers.
 
#8
Messed around on proquest today and came up with some (well, many) pdfs. Here is a fairly early review of his work from a literary mag called "The Northwest Review" circa 1963. I will post more 'at time of pub' reviews (since it seems like something fans of Mr. Buk might be into), unless a demonic little dog begins to gnaw at my fingers ... chihuahuas can be persuasive in their way.
 

Attachments

#10
These ones only make a passing mention of Mr Bukowski.

Well, shit, here come the rest of what I grabbed today - except four or five that the files are too large to be uploaded :/ Unless anybody has a different solution, if you're into these reads, let me know and I can send you the others as email attachments maybe?

especially sweet is a 20 page 1974 interview with London Magazine ...

For example:

Times: What changes have you seen in Los Angeles during the years you've lived here?
CB: Nothing astounding. It's gotten bigger, dumber, more violent and greedier. It's developed along the same lines as the rest of civilization. But there's a part of LA -- you take it away from Hollywood, Disneyland and the ocean, which are places I stay away from, except the beaches in wintertime when there's no one around-- where there's a good, easy feeling. People here have a way of minding their own business. You can get isolation here, or you can have a party. I can get on the phone and in an hour have a dozen people over drinking and laughing. And that's not because I'm a writer who's getting known a little. This has always been, even before I had any luck. But they won't come unless I phone them, unless I want them. You can have isolation, or you can have the crowd. I tend to mix the two, with a preference for isolation.
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:

mjp

Keep my good eye on the beat
Moderator
Founding member
Over 5000 posts
#12
I raised the attachment size limit from 1 to 5 mb. Since times are changing and all that.
 

Black Swan

Abord the Yorikke!
Over 1000 posts
#13
If I press on any of these links, it says : This type of file can harm your computer. Do you want to keep.......pdf anyway (Discard) or (Keep) :(
 

mjp

Keep my good eye on the beat
Moderator
Founding member
Over 5000 posts
#14
That's a generic pdf warning, it's not specific to those file attachments.

Whether you open the file depends on how much you trust the person who uploaded it.
 
#16
please don't trust me. trust your antivirus software. i have avast on mine and it seems to keep things moving clear (which is more than i can say for my inflamed and high-strung descending colon) but then i run an inspiron e1505 with '05 xp and a whopping 2 gig of ram. i gamble that viruses don't waste their time on such small potatoes.
 

Attachments

#20
thank you all guys for these awesome uploads.
I looking for (old) reviews for post office, can anybody help me? thanks again
Well, shit, here come the rest of what I grabbed today - except four or five that the files are too large to be uploaded :/ Unless anybody has a different solution, if you're into these reads, let me know and I can send you the others as email attachments maybe?
hey man, thanks for all your uploads. do you have anything more? I'm looking specially for reviews of Post Office.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BUKFAN78

Over 100 posts
#22
Wow, Dan Webster just don't get it!!

The Gerald Locklin review is quite good though. He became a friend of sorts to Buk if I'm not mistaken.
 

roni

Over 5000 posts
#23
[...] Gerald Locklin [...] became a friend of sorts to Buk if I'm not mistaken.
right.
Locklin was one of the first to invite Hank for a public reading. That was around 1970 and Locklin was a teacher of literature at a university then. He also had already been a writer at the time (and still is!). Poetry + Prose. Bukowski did like his stuff, which he stated in several letters (not solely addressed to Lock himself but also to others and: published letters!) over the time.

Locklin was also one of the (few?) friends, who Never had a fall-out with Hank. They kept their friendly status right to the end and beyond.
 
Last edited:

BUKFAN78

Over 100 posts
#24
Yeah, I was pretty sure Locklin helped with some early public readings through the university and that they remained on good terms until the end. Thanks for the clarity roni
 

Johannes

Founding member
Over 1000 posts
#27
I don't know about the Bronder.

"He's like 'the uncle' the family never talks about"?

"He sleeps late in the morning."

The misspelling of the title.

This is supposed to be a review of Bukowskis latest book? It sounds like something he jerked down in his ten minute coffee break.

But still interesting to read, thx a lot Digney!
 

Digney in Burnaby

donkeys live a long time
Over 1000 posts
#29
From Event volume two, number two, Fall 1972. Event was the lit mag of Douglas College (my old alma mater). A pretty good look at Erections, etc.

I remembered this only because I was reading the latest issue of BC BookWorld on the ferry to Victoria today and a big center spread story on Evanier. Used to be I'd find a copy of BCBW in a bookstore while at work so I'd get it for free and get paid at the same time. Today this freebie cost me $143 round trip. Seems wrong.

Untitled-1.jpg
 
Top