Thanks Ponder. What's funny is the bulk of academic discussion about Hank's work is about wether Hank's work is worth discussing at all. In the end, according to those degreed university pashas, is that any work that is direct, visceral and unambiguous, is of no real merit. So many hatreds in their contempt. For the working class, the undereducated, the disenfranchised...Hank doesn't NEED to be deconstructed by those precious pussies, he already did it himself. He is ultimately and finally, critic proof. That's why they hate him.