mjp
Founding member
I just said "closest guess," over or under. But I see by Price Is Right rules there would have been a different winner...I thought we were playing by "The Price is Right" rules. :rolleyes:
I just said "closest guess," over or under. But I see by Price Is Right rules there would have been a different winner...I thought we were playing by "The Price is Right" rules. :rolleyes:
So for coming within 139 of the actual number, marina del rey scores the ARC.
It's an interesting idea. But you know, the database doesn't even attempt to do that now. All it does is tell you if the same work (or again, essentially the same work) exists under a different title.Or you could tell me that my idea is completely baked, or way too much work and to go jump in a lake.
And I can assume that "mad enough" is the same, but I didn't want to make any assumptions unless I had to...
Everything in the database is capitalized and stripped of trailing punctuation for consistency. So:Do we worry about things titles being all capitals and things like that? Every title by Bukowski in NYQ 37 was all caps.
As long as such source is reliable, right? RIGHT?!When building a DB, the best thing you can have is a citable source for decision-making.
Me.What is the main target audience of the DB?
One new poem went up as well that is apparently uncollected, though it looks familiar.
It's gonna be one hell of a database when it's finished...
Book and magazine appearances for the manuscripts are back. Instead of being listed on the main manuscript list page they are listed when you view a manuscript.the manuscript titles no longer have book titles and pages associated with them (where applicable).