Howard Stern (1 Viewer)

Gerard K H Love

Appreciate your friends
I use to listen to Howard Stern and do not remember him ever mentioning Bukowski. Someone brought Stern up on another thread and the reactions seemed mixed. So, could one of Howard Sterns big fans fill me in?

By the way , today is his 55th birthday and Rush Limbaugh's 58th. We may as well discuss radio talk shows and Bukowski. (Wow, this is way out in left field)
 
Bukfan said:
It's not a bad thing? This is the first time I've heard somebody say that being opportunistic is not a bad thing! :confused:

I guess it depends on the opportunity.:)

mjp said:
Au contraire, Pierre! But let us not derail this thread into a pissing match over radio performers, eh?

Nah, I wouldn't take anything personally over that. I think Stern's funny, but funny like a kid giggling about boobies and farts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Stern has the mentality of a 12 year old. If he's read Bukowski, he probably didn't take away very much.

Please, there are plenty of people who don't like H Stern, I was not looking for that. Howard Stern is intelligent and may have read Bukowski.
Now that I think about it he is quite into himself.
 
gerard - i've been listening to his show since they started airing it in toronto in the 90's - i've got it on right now actually - i've never heard him talk about buk - others have referenced him on the show but stern has no experience or opinion as far as i've heard. as much as i enjoy aspects of the show he seems to have pretty juvenile tastes as far as arts and culture are concerned so doesn't seem likely.
 
I used to listen to Stern in the 90's, and I really liked his radio show at that time. I liked him/(Robin Givers), enough at that point to go and spend the $$ to see his film, "Private Parts", of which I was on the fence about afterwards. Once he came out with his cable TV program, I turned, and could not really stand him/them any longer.
Typical American Sell Out- IMO. CRB:)
 
I lived in and about new york city starting 1988 for 17 yrs....Stern, I understand, Developed a powerful audience, he was outrageous, charismatic, and challenging...but I, personally, never found any use for him. Period.
 
Howard is not for everyone; but many love him. Loyal following, etc. Lived in NY for many, many years, too. He is a character; and a caricature of himself all at once. Either you get (dig) Howard, or you don't. There doesn't seem to be a middle.
 
Yeah Chronic, his whole-'ain't I a stud' thing, meanwhile he's sooo fuglee;and then you have all those broads (sorry Ladies), taking their shirts off, which became the bulk of the show. BOOR-ING!CRB:)
 
Well, Gerald, you can only see so many women take off their shirts and expose their tits before you're thinking "God, I just wanna see some vagina!"
 
Hi GHKL, I liked the show when there was an element of thought to it. When it turned into a titty show they lost me. I have an appreciation of nice breasts,(I carry around a couple myself), but the whole 'LOOK AT ME' thing,(HIM and them) was a real turn-off for me. I have tits, it's cool; but I decided that I don't need to investigate /explore his interest in them on a daily basis. Plus he IS not an attractive man. CRB:)
 
Please, there are plenty of people who don't like H Stern, I was not looking for that. Howard Stern is intelligent and may have read Bukowski.
Now that I think about it he is quite into himself.

Very true.

I liked him back when his show was on E!. Couldn't get him on the radio around here and E! was the only way I could get my "fix." Now that he's on Sirius, I don't have the urge to check him out anymore. My interest in him was likely motivated by his controversy. And since he's on a network that lets him say whatever he wants, he's just not that interesting anymore.

To me, anyway.
 
Bukfan said:
It's not a bad thing? This is the first time I've heard somebody say that being opportunistic is not a bad thing! :confused:

Isn't that the main trait of a criminal? :eek:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bukfan said:
It's not a bad thing? This is the first time I've heard somebody say that being opportunistic is not a bad thing! :confused:

Well. If one constantly keeps taking opportunities to keep children from getting raped and tortured, I suppose that could be construed as a good thing.


But...
he's Howard Stern.
Isn't Snoop's jailbait on Stern's escort list?
Not the adorable dog, the one with the gun charges.

Isn't that the main trait of a criminal? :eek:

A sociopath, technically.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good point, Billville! I'm sure you're right, and it's probably also the main trait of a politician, well, most of them anyway...:D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But Stern ISNT an artist...at all. Hes many things, including filthy rich. But aesthetics has never bothered his brain.

To say Howard Stern isn't an artist is ABSURD. The man has written movies, music, and two New York Times best sellers. You may not appreciate him, or what he does. It's the same as saying Johnny Ramone was not a good guitar player because he only played power chords.

I was the one who originally brought up Stern in another thread, by merely innocently mentioning I discoverd Stern and Bukowski in the same year 1991. It was just a coincidence, and a few people started bashing Stern. He may not be for everyone, but he certainly cannot be denied as an artist, or as a non-talent shock jock.

BTW I have listened faithfully every single day that I could for the last 18 years to Stern and have NEVER heard him, nor anyone else on the show ever mention Bukowski. Howard has always been so deep into NY that 2 years ago he didn't even know of places like In and Out Burger and Jack In The Box, that apparently don't exist that far East. He's an avid reader and talks weekly of the books that he's read, but I have never heard him mention Bukowski.
 
^ But he was "punk." According to the myriad definitions on BUKnet.

And yes, he/they (Ramones) was certainly an artist(s). No doubt. He/they created something that will be remembered for a long time, an artifact.

Cool...
 
I listen to almost every minute of Stern's broadcast and have for many, many years. He makes me laugh. I remember one of his sidekicks, Artie Lange, mentioning Bukowski once although I can't remember the context. It didn't sound like Stern knew anything about him, which is no surprise.
 
Stern is a pop figure and an entertainer...nothing more. While there might be amusement attached to his product, there is no validity nor pertinence. The jokes are based upon nothing but insights and observances into certain socio-sexual banalities and upon conforming reports, all put-upon us by the well scripted executions of his team. He is not involved in a creative medium that will allow HIMSELF any individual growth...therefore there can be none spilling-over for his audience. Fun and funny and outrageous, perhaps...but never Art.
 
Oh stop. Just stop. Because if I have to pull this car over, everyone's going to be sorry. You hear me?

Everything's art, okay? La dee dah. I love puppies! I heart JESUS! Now lets all go piss up a rope. It would be more useful than yet another never ending debate over what is art and what isn't. Enough.
 
If you think Gen. Yamamoto regretted awakening a sleeping giant, you DO NOT want to know the terror of rousing a slumbering Poncho goblin....
 
Oh stop. Just stop. Because if I have to pull this car over, everyone's going to be sorry. You hear me?

Everything's art, okay? La dee dah. I love puppies! I heart JESUS! Now lets all go piss up a rope. It would be more useful than yet another never ending debate over what is art and what isn't. Enough.

Well, everyone picks at least ONE thing to champion...to defend the honor, purity and chastity of.
You got Bob Marley, right. I got mine. Art. So a few short posts per week might be necessary in the interest of preserving the good name of my sweet princess. You wouldn't deny a proud man that, would you?
 
I don't defend the honor of anything or anyone, I just make loud noises disguised as opinions.

Debating what makes art is like the proverbial debating of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. Everyone is wrong and everyone is right, because you're trying to define an undefinable thing. That's where puppies and JESUS come in, you see?

I knew you would understand.
 
Angels don't dance.

Besides if they did, you could always make a bigger pin.

That's what makes Howard Stern so great, he is very intelligent and will look at all aspects of a subject. Unless he is trying to get you to see his side, which is cool. It is his show and this is his thread, thank you very much.
 
But does an angel bustle in your hedgerow?

I've seen a few...while drinking scotch, I believe...

421 of 'em, or maybe 9 less...while staring at the head of a pin...

;)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top