hellooo

hi! i started going through c.b.'s work over a month ago. before that i had only read pulp when my friend recommended it to me. to be honest all i remember from pulp is drinking, celine, and aliens(?). i read it during my lunch breaks when i was working at a cemetery, and it was fun! however, i didn't feel an uncontrollable urge to seek out more bukowski or anything, mostly since from what i'd heard about him, he just seemed like an a-hole in the same mostly harmless way a lot of the men in my family are, so why read him if i could just call up my dad.

finally started going through his bibliography, and my instincts were right, BUUUT i've been having a lot of fun putting myself in the shoes of someone who doesn't really think like me but still feels extremely familiar. it's like i'm getting a behind-the-scenes into the thought processes of people i've met who i didn't really 'get'. i think i'm similar to him in nature but nurture sets us apart. the only book i've disliked so far has been women - felt too repetitive and didn't have enough charm for me to be as forgiving. lack of charm is a literary sin to me.

i started hollywood today while home with an infection because i needed a distraction from the sting of the alsol+alcohol-soaked compress that's on my wound (i think saline would've been a fine alternative, the ER nurse probably just didn't like me). it feels very different from the other stuff i've read, more docile. didn't like it at first but now i think it's sweet! we'll see how i feel about it when i finish reading it and watching barfly.

i've only read the prose so far but i'm going to start with the poetry once i'm done hollywood, love is a dog from hell to begin with. saw a lot of poor reviews of it on goodreads, but i don't really trust goodreads reviews, a lot of the people on there are insane. is there any specific mindset/perspective i should go into it with that would maximize my enjoyment?

miscellaneous info about me: i'm in my 20s, from sweden, surprisingly not an alcohol, love post-punk, and i have 2 identical posters of susan sarandon nearly topless in my room watching me write this.
 
Welcome! Yes, Bukowski never had the benefit of nurturing. I never thought about it that way, but it's true. As for the poetry, I would say that unlike most of the poets of his era, he knew how to bring it home and close the deal. Most of them, even the best among them, get close at times and then stop short.
 
I think you actually started on the wrong track. It's not your fault because the instinct is to read novels by great American writers. But Bukowski's novels are not his greatest works. You kept your interest after reading Pulp and that says something-- only hard core fans could appreciate it. And Hollywood is another weak one. Post Office and Factotum are his best.

Here is what I would recommend.

For prose start of with the short stoies in :
Notes of a Dirty Old Man

For poetry I would recommend

The Days Run Away Like Wild Horses Over The Hills

And if you like that, read:
The Last Night of the Earth Poems

Keep On Reading Buk's stuff -- you won't be disappointed. It becomes obsessive.
Best,
Mike
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top