It's up to you to decide if this example falls into that process.
No it isn't.
She's speaking in plain, declarative sentences. It's up to the listener to hear what is actually being said without projecting their personal biases and fear onto it.
Your entire argument seems like a lot of noise to distract from some underlying, dare I say,
anti-female beliefs that may have been responsible for a harsh reaction to the video in the first place. As if the #metoo hashtag made it impossible to hear what was really being said.
Institutionalized misogyny and generally accepted societal misogyny are being exposed and opposed everywhere these days, and the only people uncomfortable about that are misogynists. Odd as it may seem that anyone could be upset by, or argue against, a group of people getting a tiny, microscopic morsel of justice after dealing with tens of thousands of years of oppression and abuse, they are out there.
To me, that's what the video is about. Not art and artists. It's about whether or not we as a society are going to continue to support and endorse the abuse of women as a group, and the people who blatantly and unapologetically engage in, or even celebrate, that abuse.
We've asked ourselves these kind of questions in the past, "we" being
civilization, and we've generally said, no, we will no longer support the abuse of a certain group, or defend the people who benefit from that abuse.
You mention the "deplatforming" of a few pedophiles and neo-Nazi trolls, but what about the deplatforming that women (and everyone else who isn't a white man) have been living with as their everyday reality for all of their lives?
In fact, deplatforming seems to be the goal of posting the video here in the first place. You try to hide that goal by pointing out the option to "like/dislike," but the thread title you chose doesn't leave any doubt as to which side you come down on.
I couldn't argue against anything you're saying if your initial example had been different. But you launched your argument on a shaky, questionable foot. And now you're attempting to turn an attack on a woman's free speech into a defense of free speech.