Right, either he screwed up the date, or he thought nobody would check out when Van Gogh died. Or maybe he chose 1910 as a way of covering his ass, so that he can always say he wasn't trying to cheat people since Van Gogh died 20 years before. I guess some people think they've stumbled over a gold mine and gets so exited about it that they don't bother to check out such "details". Just think of the guy who bought that "Bukowski" drawing. It said, "Drawn in the manner of Bukowski", but I'll bet that became a Bukowski drawing in the mind of the buyer who probably did'nt focus on the actual wording, "Drawn in the manner of...". Otherwise he would'nt have paid $200 for it. That is, unless he thought a copy of a Bukowski drawing is worth paying $200 for.