On the other hand, did anyone see The Banshees Of Inisherin? I thought it was tremendous, best film of the year for me.
I would say the vibe we created - all of the core group of members - is the point that matters most in this airing of the old grievances thread. Without critical oversight, the forum would have become a cesspool.the vibe you created and fostered in the past was what made this forum inhabitable.
Who is Hanna?
that's some crazy twisted reasoning right there. but it would've been SO fitting to apply what you wrote to john martin and what he's done to the artist he discovered and put so much energy into promoting and publishing.I was thinking, what the fuck? Is this some kind of vanity outlet for the owner? Is he trying to kill off his own creation?
I've been studying Bukowski's work since the 1960s and I'd say that Michael J. Phillips'/Hannah's essays revealing the extent to which editor John Martin has monkeyed with Bukowski's texts is the most significant piece of Bukowski scholarship I've seen to date. Hands down. It was carefully done, fully documented, and right on the money. It forever changed my view of Martin as an editor. But that's just my take on it.And then there was this constantly stuck post regarding how badly Buk was treated by his editors. That thing was an embarrassment of poor scholarship and should be taken down. I was thinking, what the fuck? Is this some kind of vanity outlet for the owner? Is he trying to kill off his own creation?
If this site were hands-off, it would be indistinguishable from the bukowski social media groups.
Of the posts that get through, nearly every one is edited to some degree by zobraks or hoochmonkey. It's pretty unique.
When you try to discuss anything it gets shot down, and god forbid if you are a newbee to bukowski - they get really initiated, then they leave.