can't recall anyone's voice that was that unpleasant to the ear, though i'm sure it's out there.
Oh, it's out there. And I guess if we go back to 78s,
everyone's voice sounded like nails on a chalkboard.
I think a lot of shortcomings were overlooked on early recordings because most people were used to hearing live music in their own homes. Meaning most people played some kind of instrument and sang. Everyone sang. And when everyone sings, a lot of really bad singers sing. So maybe in the early days people's ears were more forgiving.
We didn't really have music as a profession until the 20th century. And once the recording industry convinced us that our lives would be so much better if we only listened to "professionals," a lot of people put down their instruments for good, and I think that's a shame. Everyone should be able to bang out a song in their living room, whether they suck at singing or playing or not. It feels good.
I was thinking about that a few months ago, remembering how many of my uncles played the guitar when I was a kid in the 60s. I had about 10 uncles all told, and I can't think of one who didn't play, or an aunt who couldn't be convinced to sing a song or two when we were all together for Christmas or the 4th of July or whatever. They would just as often use those guitars as weapons when they'd get into fights after a lot of drinking and singing down there in whoever's basement, but come on - what would Christmas eve be without a family brawl?
Anyway, I suppose people still make music at home, but they probably do it on their phones or tablets. Which is just sad, because no matter how drunk you get on the holidays, you can't really smash someone across the back of the head with an iPhone...it's just not an effective weapon.